The slowness of the Brazilian judiciary: The Kiss nightclub tragedy and an endless trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70430/rev.cedigma.2025.v3.5.51Keywords:
Judicial Slowness; Kiss Nightclub; Access to Justice; Impunity; Legislative Reforms.Abstract
tragedy. We investigate the causes, consequences and measures to combat the slowness of the judiciary, using the Kiss Nightclub as a case study. The slowness of the judicial system is a chronic concern in Brazil, affecting the ability to provide effective justice and universal access to justice. This study examines this issue, with a special focus on the Kiss Nightclub tragedy, which experienced considerable delays in its judicial process. The objective of this paper is to analyze the slowness of the Brazilian judicial system, identifying its main causes and consequences, as well as the measures adopted to address it, based on the Kiss Nightclub case. A qualitative and descriptive research was conducted, using document analysis and literature review as the main methods. The Kiss Nightclub case serves as a case study to illustrate the challenges of the Brazilian judicial system in complex cases. The main causes of delays include excessive bureaucracy and procedural formalities, lack of resources and adequate infrastructure, and inefficiency in the management of judicial processes. The consequences include lack of access to justice and a sense of impunity. Measures to combat delays involve legislative reforms and the use of faster trial techniques, such as mediation and conciliation. The slowness of the Brazilian judiciary is a persistent challenge that harms society and access to justice. The Kiss nightclub case exemplifies how slowness in the legal system can prolong the suffering of victims. To address this issue, legislative reforms and the promotion of alternative dispute resolution methods are crucial steps. However, substantive change requires a continued commitment to efficiency and universal access to justice for all Brazilian citizens.
Downloads
References
Barbosa, R. P. (2020). Reforma do Código de Processo Civil - Comentários Pontuais. Saraiva Educação.
Gonçalves, F. S. (2017). Estratégias de Combate à Morosidade do Sistema Judiciário. Revista de Direito Administrativo, 32(1), 76-91.
Lima, R. G. (2016). Acesso à Justiça e Morosidade Processual: Reflexões Sobre o Sistema Judicial Brasileiro. Revista Jus Navigandi, 21(4631).
Machado, T. (2019). A Morosidade do Sistema Judicial Brasileiro. Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM, 14(2).
Mendes, G. A. (2017). Curso de Direito Processual Civil. Saraiva.
Moraes, A. de. (2018). Curso de Direito Constitucional. Atlas.
Silva, J. A. (2015). A Tragédia da Boate Kiss: Estudo de Caso Sobre os Desafios do Sistema Judiciário Brasileiro. Revista de Direito da UFSM, 40(3).
Silva, M. C. (2020). Consequências da Morosidade Processual no Acesso à Justiça. Revista Brasileira de Direito, 28(4), 112-128.
Souza, J. A. (2019). Morosidade no Sistema Judiciário Brasileiro: Causas e Desafios. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual, 25(2), 45-61.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cedigma Magazine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado , fornecer um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas . Você pode fazer isso de qualquer maneira razoável, mas não de nenhuma forma que sugira que o licenciante endossa você ou seu uso.
- Compartilhamento pela mesma licença — Se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, deverá distribuir suas contribuições sob a mesma licença do original.
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos legais ou medidas tecnológicas que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazer qualquer coisa que a licença permita.